Sunday, February 9, 2014

2014 OSCAR PREVIEW IN REVERE MAGAZINE


 
The one thing that is usually certain, a formality really, on Oscar nomination morning is there will be a handful of surprises. There will be those who didn’t garner much attention during the season that sneak in with a nomination, and of course those that were overlooked, the snubs. But in a year that has seen very little movement, and had films that secured frontrunner status since early October, there was one surprise when the nominations were announced: that the Academy, for the most part, got it right. At five A.M. on Thursday 1/16, when Chris Hemsworth and Cheryl Boone Issacs, the Academy president, read the nominations there were no uproars in critic’s circles, no Twittersphere chants of wrongdoing, and no cries for the missing Saving Mr. Banks. No, the Oscar nomination announcement was rather uneventful, unfortunately the way it probably should be every year.

With that said, let’s take a look at the nominees and break down where there could be a claim of snubbery as well as see which categories are primed to produce close races:

Best Picture

Not a lot of surprises here, the big frontrunners all season, for Picture and various other categories, have been 12 Years a Slave and Gravity. The two films remain the top two favorites for the category along with American Hustle a close third. 12 Years won the Golden Globe and Critics Choice awards so it has the slight edge now but with well over a month to go things can change. It should be noted that American Hustle won Best Ensemble Cast at the SAG Awards. Because the SAG Awards only recognize acting it’s hard to say that Hustle is now in the mix but the Best Ensemble Cast in a Drama at the SAGs has shown some correlation to Best Picture wins in the past, something to keep an eye on. The only nom that is somewhat of a surprise is Philomena. Not to say it’s not deserving, and I have not seen it, but I would have thought a film like All Is Lost or Fruitvale Station had a better chance of getting in. All things considered no real snubs in the category.

Best Actor in a Leading Role

The Best Actor category looked like one of the tighter races at the beginning of the season but in the last couple of weeks there has been separation. I’m speaking about favorites Matthew McConaughey (Dallas Buyers Club) and Chiwetel Ejiofor (12 Years). It has been well documented that films covering the Holocaust, WWII, race related issues, and the like usually turn out the voting Academy. However when you have an HIV/AIDS patient going up against a free black man sold into slavery all bets are off. In what looked like a neck and neck bout on paper, with each actor getting support and awards from different bodies of critics, McConaughey has now swept the Golden Globe, Critic’s Choice, and SAG awards making it all the more difficult for Ejiofor to make a comeback. The last big award barometer is the BAFTAs, if McConaughey grabs that as well look for him to take home the Oscar. DiCaprio and Bale are a little bit of a surprise here, not because they didn’t give great performances but because Wolf of Wall Street wasn’t a huge critical success and American Hustle was more of an ensemble piece than a vehicle for Bale. There’s a little bit of a snub factor for Joaquin Phoenix (Her) and Robert Redford (All Is Lost).

Best Actress in a Leading Role

One of the weaker categories on paper this year, The Best Actress Oscar is all but wrapped up for Cate Blanchett for her turn in Woody Allen’s Blue Jasmine. She has all the critics wins leading up to the first big award week and then promptly swept the Golden Globe, Critic’s Choice, and SAG awards like McConaughey. Right now the only contender, albeit an extreme dark horse at the moment, is Sandra Bullock for Gravity. Bullock is well like by the voters and even won the Best Actress Oscar for The Blind Side (the performance was good but not great and the movie was extremely overrated). If anyone has a chance to unseat Blanchett it’s Bullock. Meryl Streep secured her 18th Oscar nomination, far and away the most ever, however August: Osage County hasn’t played well with the critics and Streep is a long shot.

Actor and Actress in a Supporting Role

The best races could very well end up being in the Supporting Actor and Actress categories. The Supporting Actor race is led by Jared Leto for his role as a cross dressing HIV/AIDS patient in Dallas Buyers Club and the performance really was extraordinary. Not to be outdone there is the gruesome performance turned in by Michael Fassbender as a slave owner in 12 Years, which in many other years would be the hands down favorite. Leto has dominated so far with a Golden Globe, Critic’s Choice, and SAG sweep. Fassbender is due after being looked over for so many other great performances but he may have to wait at least another year. Bradley Cooper (Hustle) is on the outside looking in hoping that Leto and Fassbender split votes to send him to the podium. The closest race of the season so far is for Supporting Actress. Jennifer Lawrence won the Globe for American Hustle and Lupita Nyong’o (12 Years) took home the Critic’s Choice and SAG awards. Lawrence is well liked by the Academy and really is mesmerizing in Hustle but Nyong’o steals the show in 12 Years. Nyong’o complements the performances of Ejiofor and Fassbender well and elevated the film as a whole. She captures both the despair of the situation and the perseverance of the human spirit in perfect harmony. Right now it’s a push but if I had to choose I’d give Nyong’o the slight edge.

Best Director

Martin Scorsese is the name everyone recognizes but he, along with the voting Academy, knows the nomination is the win for Wolf of Wall Street. This year has a few directors that have been nominated before; Scorsese, Alexander Payne (Nebraska), and David O. Russell (American Hustle), but the race as it stands is between two newcomers: Alfonso Cuaron (Gravity) and Steve McQueen (12 Years). Cuaron has been nominated previously for his screenplays (Children of Men and Y Tu Mama Tambien) but it is his first directing nom. As it stands Cuaron has the momentum after sweeping the Golden Globe and Critic’s Choice. It is unfortunate because I think 12 Years is more of a directing feat than Gravity. Sure Gravity is a great film and Cuaron’s vision should not be discounted but it stands on visual merit and grandiose scope. 12 Years gathers amazing performances, a terrific script, perfect pacing, and great traditional cinematography to boast an overall great picture. The ability to harness all those elements into a complete work is more of an accomplishment in my eyes. Unfortunately I think Cuaron will best McQueen when it’s all said and done.

Best Screenplay, Original and Adapted

The Screenplay categories, both Original and Adapted, are a little clearer at this point in time. The Original Screenplay victor should be decided between American Hustle and Her. Her, for its truly original story and social commentary on how we relate and evolve with technology should be applauded but the Academy has yet to show any love to Spike Jonze and David O. Russell’s American Hustle will most likely win. In the Adapted category there’s really no opponent to what John Ridley did with Solomon Northup’s account of his life in 12 Years a Slave and I expect a win there.

Technical and Other Categories

The tech Oscars, specifically Cinematography, Editing, Visual Effects, and Sound will probably all go to Gravity, and rightfully so. This film lives and dies with how the audience interpreted its visual prowess and it delivered. Other categories of note are Animated Feature where a win for Frozen seems like a good bet and Achievement in Hair and Makeup where Dallas Buyers Club should be a lock.

Due to this year’s Olympics in February the Oscars have been pushed back all the way until March 2nd. The good news being it should give voters ample time to screen anything they haven’t before casting their ballots. The bad news is we still need to wait another month to settle all these races. In a season that has seen very little surprises Oscar Night just might provide a few of them.

Monday, February 3, 2014

SUNDANCE 2014

 
Ever since attending the Telluride Film Festival for the first time in 2012 I’ve made it a goal to hit all the major festivals (Sundance, Toronto, NY, Venice, Berlin…Cannes if I can ever get an invite) on the global and awards circuit. Considering the geographic and fiscal restraints of many of the festivals the logical choice for my second major festival was Sundance. So this year, with the help of a cheap ticket on Frontier and the hospitality of staying with friends who live in Salt Lake, I was able to make the 2014 Sundance Film Festival in Park City, Utah.


Sundance, along with many of the other festivals, works a little differently than Telluride. The schedule is released well in advance and if you aren’t a pass holder you even have the opportunity to buy single tickets online before getting to the mountains. Sundance lasts much longer and includes more films, Sundance lasts ten days while Telluride is only four. The biggest and most apparent difference however is the festivals coverage.

Although Sundance is famous for its inclusion of primarily indie films the media hype and corporate presence is vast. Telluride had 12 Years a Slave, Gravity, Inside Llewyn Davis, The Wind Rises…some of this year’s biggest Oscar contenders, yet it feels like Hollywood isn’t even there. No huge VIP parties, no goodie bag giveaways, I didn’t even see a cop the whole time I was there last year. The reason being is everyone in Hollywood is trying to find that next big thing, where they can invest on the cheap and reap a big return. Whereas festivals like Telluride and Toronto have the big lineups and the majority of the films already have the distribution backing needed.

There are definite benefits to the way Sundance is conducted. The ability to see what’s playing and get tickets (if you’re not a pass holder) before showing up is a big selling point and relieves some of the stress of uncertainty that Telluride poses. The inclusion of a large corporate presence is nice because there are freebies everywhere. Chase Sapphire, one of the festival’s main sponsors, hosted a free VIP party with cocktails and appetizers for cardholders, while Airbnb had a free Bingo and Beer event. Only being there for a few days meant missing some of the other opportunities to score some giveaways but the two events I was able to go to where awesome.
Unfortunately there are downfalls as well. Because the film is made up of lesser known films, studios, and filmmakers there is a greater possibility you’re going to run into a dud of a film. Case in point: Jamie Marks Is Dead, the first film I saw. The director Carter Smith has only one recognizable film under his belt, Ruins, which was eh…ok at best. It suffers from a terrible script, no conceivable message, and lukewarm performances. Most of the audience didn’t stick around for the Q&A afterwards. Also, the corporate presence, although welcomed in some areas, can be a little overbearing and take away from the real reason most of the attendees are there, the films.

The only other film I got to see was Rich Hill, the eventual winner for U.S. Grand Jury Prize: Documentary. The film was an intimate portrait of three families struggling with poverty in Middle America. The film did a great job showcasing the hardships of the families while also showing the inherent hope they all possessed.

All things considered I was very impressed with the festival Sundance puts on and I look forward to returning next year. NOTE: The film Whiplash won U.S. Grand Jury Prize: Dramatic, look for it to get wide distribution later this year.