The
last time a Paul Thomas Anderson picture played on screens around the world we
got ‘There Will Be Blood’, now, five long years later, he delivers ‘The Master’. What had been hyped as the “Scientology”
movie, Anderson explores something different entirely, using a pseudo “religion”
and book (‘The Cause’) simply to add scenery.
The film deals much less with intricacies of the polarizing religion of
Scientology, although plot roots do stem from the aforementioned, and much more
with the psycho/social aspects of our pasts and the relationship(s) of our leaders
and followers.
Right
away, with PT Anderson (see also ‘Magnolia’ and ‘Boogie Nights’), we can be
thinking Oscar. However Anderson, who
can steer towards incoherence and lack of cohesive story structure, gives us
his most fragmented and fractured film yet, something that can scare off the
majority while strengthening the enthusiasm of his ardent followers (the Ron
Paul effect). This is evident on the
Tomatometer. The film garners a very respectable
85% currently, yet if the majority of critics were like me it wouldn’t fall too
short of 100%. It is a modern day
masterpiece, something that will be viewed as underrated in future
decades. For anyone that saw Malick’s ‘The
Tree of Life’ last year, this is probably my favorite film since, definitely a
top five film of the last few years.
Anderson
brings two things to the table he never seems to be lacking; incredibly thought
provoking situations/scenes that progress or showcase his characters and some
of the best, most spot on dialogue of any screenwriter in the business. From his main character Freddie’s (Joaquin Phoenix)
drunken sexual encounter with a sand mermaid to Lancaster Dodd’s (the
incomparable Phillip Seymour Hoffman) angry exchange with a doubter at a
fundraising event, Anderson puts his characters in situations where they are
vulnerable, intimate, and can display their motives.
Although
Anderson is the real star of the show, Phoenix and Hoffman are no
slouches. Both vets with Oscar noms
under their belts they should be shoe-ins for some Academy attention, my only
worries would be the film’s polarizing effect so far and the lack of people
seeing/talking about it as a frontrunner.
Amy Adams puts in a good effort as Dodd’s steadfast wife; don’t be
surprised to see the young vet’s name thrown around in Oscar circles for a
supporting nod come January.
Since
2009’s ‘The Hurt Locker’ I have had the misfortune of enjoying the best films
of the year just not the Oscar’s view of best films of the year, although I did
much appreciate the Academy paying homage to history by recognizing ‘The Artist’. This year will be no different unless
something can sway my gaze from ‘The Master’, which will get attention and its
followers excited, just not the votes needed, with the exception of Phoenix and
Hoffman, to run to the podium.
Oscar Chances:
Best Picture: Highly Likely
Best Director (Anderson): Highly Likely
Best Original Screenplay (Anderson): Lock
Best Actor (Phoenix): Lock
Best Supporting Actor (Hoffman): Lock
Best Supporting Actress (Adams): Possible
Best Cinematography: Highly Likely
Best Editing: Possible
Best Art Direction: Possible
Best Score: Possible